Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P9: Opening versus interior
Separate passing through the hatch from positioning inside, and ask the model to identify assumed dimensions.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?[Added] Distinguish getting it through the hatch opening from finding an orientation inside the cabin, and state any dimensions you have to assume.
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit? Distinguish getting it through the hatch opening from finding an orientation inside the cabin, and state any dimensions you have to assume.
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | YES | Clearly affirms fit after unboxing, folding the rear seats, reclining the passenger seat, and angling the slab from the trunk floor onto the padded dashboard. Assumes a 105–110-inch diagonal and warns about restraint and mirror interference. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | NO | Explicitly rejects enclosed fit only in an assumed normal rear-seats-folded cargo envelope, excluding the front passenger footwell. Acknowledges passenger-area repurposing as an exception, not blanket geometric impossibility. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Gives a clear probable no for full closed-hatch fit, not merely a delivery recommendation. Allows hatch entry but assumes a 96–97-inch straight limit even with the passenger seat repositioned and considers on-edge placement still marginal. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | NO | Explicitly rejects closed-hatch fit with a driver in place while accepting hatch passage. The verdict includes safe, usable transport assumptions and a 93-inch Long Mode limit; it rejects diagonals and dashboard pitching as obstructed or unsafe. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Uncertain | Affirms hatch entry but explicitly leaves cabin fit borderline. Folded rear seats, a fully reclined passenger seat, and unverified 94–100-inch Long Mode capacity could allow or prevent fit; driver usability and dash clearance still need checking. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Clearly allows hatch passage but denies full cabin accommodation with the car intact and seats in place. Assumes an 88–95-inch practical interior span and dismisses the longer theoretical diagonal because the slab's width meets pillars or wheel wells. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | YES | Opens with a clear probable yes, not a guarantee. Assumes diagonal upright loading, rear seats folded, passenger seat moved forward, a roughly 27 × 40-inch hatch, and a usable 92 × 39-inch side-view span; later measurement caveats qualify that affirmative stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | Uncertain | Affirms hatch passage but leaves full closed-cabin fit borderline rather than settling yes or no. Requires rear seats down and bridging into passenger space; says seat position, dashboard contact, and hatch shape can flip the result, while distinguishing a shorter catalogued slab. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | Uncertain | The strong negative is restricted to rear seats in place; full-cabin fit with folded rear/passenger seats remains a tight diagonal possibility. Its uncertain 90–96-inch hatch-to-dash estimate and delivery advice do not settle that overall physical-fit question. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Clearly gives a probable no for full enclosure with the driver seated normally, while affirming hatch entry. Assumed 93–94-inch Long Mode length and front-cabin width/height constraints underpin the verdict; safety further limits diagonal placements. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Explicitly says the slab passes through the opening but cannot fit fully inside with the hatch closed. Assumes 90–93-inch Long Mode capacity and rejects dashboard, footwell, and diagonal placement because of the slab's width. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Clearly rejects full closed-hatch fit while allowing hatch entry. Assumes roughly 94–96 inches of straight cabin length and larger boxed dimensions; rejects reclined-seat and tilted orientations on clearance and driver-space grounds. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Explicitly rejects both checks, but restricts cabin fit to seats up and floor-flat placement, excluding seat folding and meaningful tilting. Its hatch rejection incorrectly compares the slab's full length with opening width rather than allowing lengthwise passage. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | The repeated overall no is explicitly limited to safe, no-contact closed-hatch stowage under assumed US-spec seat limitations. It nevertheless admits hatch closure with steep on-edge dashboard/windshield contact and obstructed controls, so this is not an unqualified geometric impossibility claim. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Explicitly rejects both hatch passage and cabin fit in any orientation. The reasoning contains major dimensional contradictions, including calling 98 inches 24 feet and claiming 25.5875 inches exceeds a 39.5-inch opening; those errors do not obscure its negative stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Final verdict rejects both hatch passage and cabin fit, even with front and rear seats folded and diagonal placement. Assumes stock components remain installed and treats hatch diagonal as a length limit; the opening's tilted-edge caveat does not survive the categorical final verdict. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Clearly concludes probable non-fit fully enclosed, while affirming hatch passage. Assumes insufficient length even toward the front passenger area; protrusion or interior-component removal are exceptions, not an unresolved overall verdict. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | Uncertain | Expects hatch entry but leaves full enclosed fit unresolved. Its diagonal calculation requires an unverified clear 93 × 35 × 25⅝-inch cabin envelope without seat, dash, hatch, or driver interference. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Affirms hatch passage but explicitly denies cabin fit in a standard car. Assumes a roughly 47-inch folded-seat floor and says angled placement would require seat or trim removal and risk steering obstruction; modification possibilities do not leave its stock-car verdict unresolved. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Explicitly rejects both entry and cabin placement with seats installed, including repositioning and rotation. Uses assumed 37-inch hatch and 60-inch floor diagonals as limits; the stated 150-inch overall cabin length is inconsistent with its space argument, but its verdict remains unequivocally no. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | YES | Clear affirmative relies on assumed 96–101-inch flat length with rear seats and both front seatbacks folded, a consequential configuration that does not establish safe driving; requests measurement confirmation. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Categorically rejects hatch passage and every cabin orientation, relying on an assumed 31-by-22-inch hatch and roughly 72-inch interior length; treats the opening diagonal as a limit on board length. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | YES | Affirms fully enclosed fit using an on-edge three-dimensional diagonal from the passenger footwell to the opposite rear corner, relying on assumed cabin dimensions and reconfigured seats. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | NO | Says the end section passes through the hatch but the whole slab cannot remain inside, assuming an 80–90-inch maximum cabin run and no major seat disassembly. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | NO | Says the slab passes through the hatch but cannot fit fully inside with it closed under normal seating configurations. The negative verdict relies on assumed cabin dimensions and excludes seat removal or major adjustment. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | Uncertain | Affirms hatch passage but leaves cabin fit unresolved: a reconfigured or diagonal path might work only if unverified clearances reach 98 inches; closed-hatch fit remains doubtful. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Clearly affirms diagonal fit with seats folded/repositioned and estimated clearances. Also claims a 96.9-inch actual length despite the specified 98 inches; later hatch cautions do not withdraw its affirmative stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |