Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P11: Skeptical first impression
Add a skeptical guess, explicitly asking the model to assess independently; pair with P12.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?[Added] My initial guess is that it will not fit. Please assess the dimensions independently rather than agreeing with my guess.
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit? My initial guess is that it will not fit. Please assess the dimensions independently rather than agreeing with my guess.
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | NO | Agrees with the skeptical guess and gives NO, claiming only 80–84 inches of maximum diagonal space even after seat adjustments. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | YES | Although initially tentative, ends with an explicit yes to physical fit using maximum seat reconfiguration and diagonal footwell loading; no guaranteed clearance margin. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Qualified probable NO for normal hatch-closed fit: explicitly says to treat it as no and calls the user's negative guess probably right, despite acknowledging a theoretical compromised diagonal squeeze. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | YES | Clearly affirms enclosed fit for the unboxed slab diagonally in Long Mode with a corner in the passenger footwell and no front passenger; packaging or glass pressure may defeat that arrangement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | YES | Probable YES despite the skeptical framing, relying on Long Mode, passenger-seat repositioning and diagonal loading; asks to verify the tight clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Explicit no for fully enclosed transport, including folded/repositioned seats; rejects a usable cabin diagonal and allows only protruding transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | YES | Explicit probable yes requires diagonal Long Mode loading, assuming about 96 inches of usable length and roughly 45 inches of clear width. Later measurement cautions and the no-if-certainty-needed qualification do not withdraw the probable affirmative stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | NO | Explicitly rejects fully enclosed fit using rear seats folded and the passenger seat fully forward; claims width defeats narrow-item diagonal routes and excludes seat removal. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | NO | Probable NO with an added hatch-closure assumption; says the length exceeds usable capacity even with the passenger seat folded and diagonal placement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Strong NO under an added closed-hatch requirement; argues the asserted Long Mode length and diagonal constraints leave the countertop too long. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Clearly rejects closed-tailgate fit even with the passenger seat reclined, assuming a 94–96-inch maximum and width/seat-height obstructions to alternative paths. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Clearly rejects hatch-closed fit using a roughly 100-inch packaged slab rather than only the stated bare dimensions; also claims the bare 98-inch length exceeds Long Mode and width blocks windshield clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Explicit no under a narrowed flat, horizontal cargo-floor interpretation with rear seats folded; excludes edge-on and unconventional full-cabin loading as impractical or unsafe. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Explicitly rejects every fully enclosed orientation, assuming at most 95.5 inches with the passenger seat folded and claiming the slab width defeats diagonal alternatives. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Explicit no based on comparing the countertop's length with cargo width and height; does not establish a full-cabin seat-reconfigured loading path. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Categorical no with doors closed, extending a rear-cargo floor-diagonal comparison to all seat positions and angles without separately establishing full-cabin clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Explicit no with the hatch closed; considers front-passenger-seat long mode and rejects diagonal loading because of slab width, entry constraints, and cabin obstructions. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | Uncertain | Rejects straight flat loading but leaves an edge-on diagonal fit unresolved: nominal 93-inch capacity does not prove a clear diagonal volume. Adds hatch-closure and secure-load requirements, without an overall probable yes or no. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Explicit no from claimed cargo and hatch-opening limits; treats the board's full length as needing to fit the opening diagonal and never develops its mentioned footwell path. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Definite no in any orientation, based on a folded-rear-seat cargo box and claimed hatch-entry limits; does not include front-passenger-seat extension. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | YES | Gives an explicit probable yes for the bare countertop angled upward in Long Mode with rear and passenger seats folded; flat loading and oversized packaging are separate negatives. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | YES | Clearly affirms fit, but assumes all four seats, including the driver's, are folded and a clear path extends over the footwell toward the dash; hatch closure remains a loading condition. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Unambiguous no after restricting 'inside' to the trunk/cargo floor and dismissing cabin extension; reverses the required/available labels without changing its conclusion. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | NO | Categorical no: claims the rear-cargo diagonal is too short and the slab's depth blocks extension into the front footwell; excludes open-hatch transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | NO | Concludes the slab cannot be fully contained with front seats installed in the normal configuration; distinguishes open-hatch transport and removed or significantly rearranged seats. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | API error | The provider or API returned an error; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | YES | Ultimately gives a probable closed-tailgate yes with rear and passenger seatbacks folded and careful angling; its cargo-floor no and packaging caveat do not negate that stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Clear probable yes via a 3D diagonal with rear and front-passenger seats folded; borderline hatch closure is a caveat, including a possible gap and strapped-hatch fallback. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |