Fit agreement · eligible for rank

P2: Inches only

Base question: imperial dimensions, vehicle generation and year, with no loading instructions.

Changes from the base question.

Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.

Base question — no words added or removed.

The exact prompt sent.

Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?

No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.

One question, every model.

Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.

Every published model outcome for P2. Labels are AI-assisted review, not independently verified fit judgments.
ModelReviewed label / statusReview reason / coverage noteExact text & provenance
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteYESOverall affirmative with rear and passenger seats flat; later explicitly says the hatch will not close, treating protruding hatch-open carriage as fit.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
StepFun: Step 5 PreviewYESClearly affirms a tight diagonal fit with rear seats down and the passenger seat moved/folded forward. Says normal rear-seats-up loading fails and that warping or tight hatch/headliner clearance could defeat the fit, without withdrawing its overall yes.Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017YESOverall affirmative for an on-edge diagonal load with rear seats down and passenger seat reclined; it warns that the hatch may need to remain partly open and calls fully enclosed fit borderline.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Meta: Muse WonderYESAffirms a tight diagonal fit using Long Mode and says the hatch should latch; seat adjustment, securing the load, and an open-hatch fallback are practical caveats rather than a retraction.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5UncertainPresents unresolved possibilities and makes fit conditional on measuring sufficient clearance, not an affirmative verdict about this car.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BNOClear practical no: it allows a theoretical diagonal arrangement but says that arrangement cannot close the hatch safely and is not transportable.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
OpenAI: GPT-6 LunaNOExplicitly rejects fit with the added closed-hatch requirement, citing nominal long-mode length and declining to rely on a diagonal placement.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7NORejects fit with the hatch closed, an added assumption not stated in this prompt. Treats the available straight load length as too short; this label records its verdict, not independent validation of those measurements.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5UncertainHedges between difficulty and a possible angled fit with the front passenger seat folded; never resolves whether it fits or the hatch closes.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5NOOverall verdict is probably not, qualified by added safe-transport and closed-hatch assumptions rather than an unrestricted physical-fit question.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Google: Gemini 3.8 FlashNORejects complete interior fit under an added closed-hatch condition, while allowing hatch-open carriage with the countertop protruding.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Google: Gemini 4 ArgonNOOverall no assumes the rear hatch must close; explicitly allows transport with the hatch open and some countertop protruding.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
IBM: Granite 4.2 8BNOOverall no based on its claimed length limit with rear seats folded. It assumes flat or near-flat practical transport and expressly excludes diagonal loading on safety and damage grounds.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Meta: Muse Spark OpenNOOverall no for safe, closed-hatch fit, particularly straight and fully supported; it allows mathematical diagonal wedging and an ajar hatch but treats those as unsafe or damaging alternatives.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512NOClear physical-fit rejection based on claimed cargo limits even with seats folded, rather than a confidence-threshold response.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 LightningNOUnambiguously rejects interior fit even with all seats folded and argues that both extended length and diagonal clearance are insufficient.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNOExplicitly says no to fully enclosed fit with the doors closed; treats hatch-open protrusion as outside the requested interior fit rather than an affirmative workaround.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolNOAdvises against counting on fit with the added fully closed-hatch requirement; explicitly leaves diagonal physical fit unresolved.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Upstage: Solar Mini 4NOClearly says the countertop cannot fit and calls it physically impossible. The explanation relies on cargo length behind the rear seats rather than assessing a fully reconfigured cabin; safe-transport advice is secondary, not a hatch-closure or safety condition on the verdict.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Cohere: Command A+NOExplicitly says no based on claimed cargo-area length, volume, and loading limits, adding a weight/load-rating objection. The conclusion is physical non-fit, not merely a safety or hatch-closure caveat.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813NOSays the intact countertop will not fit because its claimed 93–94-inch maximum with the passenger seat folded is shorter than 98 inches, and the slab's depth prevents gaining enough diagonal room.Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records
inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 FlashNOClearly rejects fit on the added condition that the car must close fully, attributing the problem to length rather than width or thickness.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2BNOClearly denies interior fit in any practical orientation based on its claimed cargo length and hatch-opening dimensions; this is a physical-fit verdict, not a confidence-threshold refusal.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records
Mistral: Mistral Large 4YESExplicitly affirms a very tight, steep diagonal fit with rear/passenger seats folded and both front seats moved forward. Warns of driver/console interference and that the hatch may need to stay ajar, so the yes is not a guarantee of enclosed or unobstructed transport.Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records
Qwen: Qwen3.5-9BTransport errorThe request failed in transit; there is no scored answer.Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27BEmpty answerThe request did not produce a non-empty final answer.Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records
Qwen: Qwen3.8 FlashTransport errorThe request failed in transit; there is no scored answer.Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNOTreats fitting inside as a reliable, fully enclosed, hatch-closed fit and says no, even with passenger-seat Long Mode near its length limit. Allows a measured diagonal or protruding load only as maybe, not a confident enclosed fit.Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-FlashNORejects both cargo-area and full-cabin diagonal fit with rear seats folded and front seats forward, claiming insufficient length. Explicitly distinguishes a strapped, protruding load through an open hatch from fitting inside.Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 PrimeYESOverall verdict is affirmative with diagonal placement and passenger-seat repositioning; it expressly allows the hatch to remain slightly ajar, so the yes does not guarantee fully enclosed fit.Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records