Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P6: Dimensions in centimeters
Replace the dimension values with exact centimeter conversions; retain the product's 98-inch size name.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures [Removed] 98[Added] 248.92 [Removed] inches[Added] centimeters long × [Removed] 25[Added] 65.0875 [Removed] 5/8 inches[Added] centimeters deep × [Removed] 1[Added] 3.81 [Removed] 1/2 inches[Added] centimeters thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 248.92 centimeters long × 65.0875 centimeters deep × 3.81 centimeters thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | YES | Says the unboxed countertop fits with seats folded/reclined and diagonal loading; its closed-hatch NO applies to the added packaging. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | Uncertain | Rejects normal cargo-area transport but leaves an extreme forward-angled configuration open; gives no clear physical-fit verdict after seat rearrangement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Rejects fully enclosed fit in the stock interior, treating diagonal placement as unreliable and allowing only open-hatch transport or seat alterations. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | NO | Says no with the hatch closed even in Long Mode with rear seat folded, front passenger seat reclined, and headrest removed. Allows partial loading with rear overhang, but rejects wedging the wide slab against the dashboard or windshield as damaging and unsafe. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | NO | Clearly rejects a closed-hatch fit despite folding the passenger seat, using a recalled Long Mode length range. Acknowledges possible angling with the hatch open but rejects that on safety grounds; the verdict is not unrestricted geometric impossibility. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Clearly says the 98-inch slab is too long even using the passenger compartment with the front seat fully forward and diagonal loading. Its claim that a 96-inch slab is borderline conflicts with its shorter maximum-diagonal estimate, but the 98-inch verdict remains consistently no. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | NO | Overall negative verdict is specifically about reliable closed-hatch transport, assuming rear seats folded and passenger seat reclined. Treats the advertised 93-inch length as five inches short and doubts that angling permits safe hatch closure. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | NO | Explicitly defines inside as entirely in the cabin with the hatch latched. Says folded rear seats and forward front-seat positions still lack the length and diagonal clearance for a rigid, wide panel. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | NO | Leads with an overall probable no, while allowing an unconfirmed tight diagonal fit with the rear seats and passenger seat folded. Explicitly rules out the upright passenger seat and asks for measurements; hatch closure is not established. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Overall probable no assumes full containment with the hatch closed, even in reclined-passenger-seat Long Mode. Cites packaging and insufficient length, plus driver/control clearance and windshield/airbag risks; rejects open-hatch transport as unsafe. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Says the countertop cannot fit with the hatch closed, citing asserted length and width constraints even after reclining the passenger seat. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Rejects full enclosure under added closed-hatch and packaging assumptions; says even Long Mode and diagonal placement fall short. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Explicitly says no for normal, stable cargo-space placement with standard seat positions. Bases this on claimed 105–115 cm cargo length and 45–60 cm width, excluding unconventional positioning, component removal, or unsafe wedging rather than assessing every possible whole-cabin arrangement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Rejects a closed-hatch, no-damage move using its claimed maximum Long Mode diagonal and assumption that the US front passenger seat cannot form a flat shelf. Acknowledges hatch-open transport but warns about support, damage, and exhaust intrusion. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Concludes the slab cannot fit even with rear seats removed, based on its claimed cargo length and depth restrictions. The stated cargo length decreases after seat removal, but this inconsistency does not alter its clear negative stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Says no even with rear seats folded and the tailgate open, treating a claimed 234 cm open-tailgate load length as a limit. Rejects flat loading and considers diagonal loading unlikely without damage; recommends a larger vehicle or cutting. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Rejects a fully enclosed, hatch-closed fit based on floor length with rear seats folded and lack of a practical diagonal path around the front seats and dashboard. Allows possible hatch-open overhang but says it would not be enclosed or secure for travel. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | Uncertain | Warns against counting on a closed-hatch fit but explicitly leaves an on-edge diagonal fit unresolved, rather than declaring impossibility. Requires checking the reclined-seat route, packaging, hatch/glass clearance and driver/airbag safety before confirming. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Categorically rejects the intact slab in any configuration, including folded-rear-seat and diagonal loading, on its asserted entry and interior-bay limits; cutting the slab is presented as a different case. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Gives an unqualified no using rear-folded cargo-compartment and diagonal estimates, plus asserted loading and driver-view safety concerns; it does not evaluate a reclined-passenger-seat long-load configuration. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | YES | Affirms a barely fitting unboxed countertop at an assumed 98-inch Long Mode limit, with rear and front passenger seatbacks folded; excludes packaging. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | NO | Categorically rejects fit even with rear seats folded and the passenger seat laid flat, asserting insufficient length and wheel-well/dashboard/roof obstructions to a diagonal placement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Consistently concludes the intact slab cannot fit in any orientation without cutting or reconfiguration. Uses cargo length, opening, and volume assumptions; its separate 2.6 m diagonal claim conflicts with its shorter usable-length estimates, but it still explicitly rejects diagonal fit. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | YES | Affirms physical fit by using a steep rear-floor-to-windshield-header diagonal. Crucially assumes the front passenger seat folds completely flat against the dashboard and allows its removal if dashboard clearance is insufficient. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | YES | Gives a clear borderline, probable yes with rear seats down, an equipped fold-flat front passenger seat, and angled placement toward the footwell. Requires measurement and warns that packaging or an easy, guaranteed hatch closure may change the answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Uncertain | Rejects a floor-plane fit but leaves a reclined-passenger-seat 3D diagonal only conditionally possible; its estimated tiny margin and unresolved maneuvering/interior clearances prevent an overall yes. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Clearly says it should fit using the whole cabin, with rear seats folded, passenger headrest removed and seat reclined, and the slab resting toward the dashboard. Expects the hatch to latch on a driver-only trip, while advising measurement and acknowledging trim differences. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |