Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P14: Consider a diagonal
Suggest diagonal placement as a possibility, without supplying an interior measurement or the answer.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?[Added] Before answering, consider whether a diagonal orientation could change the result. Do not assume made-up interior measurements.
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit? Before answering, consider whether a diagonal orientation could change the result. Do not assume made-up interior measurements.
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | NO | Rejects fit even with diagonal loading and seat manipulation, assuming hatch closure and an asserted 80–85-inch maximum interior diagonal. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | Uncertain | Its no applies only to normal safe cargo-area loading with the hatch closed; diagonal loading into the passenger footwell with the front seat reclined or removed remains unresolved pending measurement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Uncertain | Explicitly cannot determine overall fit without measurements; rejects normal flat placement but leaves diagonal fit conditional on seat configuration and usable hatch clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | Uncertain | Leaves diagonal fit possible but unproven rather than settling yes or no; requires actual closed-hatch and panel-width checks with the seats in long-load configuration. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | NO | Predicts closed-hatch nonfit while acknowledging unreliable dimensions and requesting a diagonal measurement; this is a qualified probable negative, not proven impossibility. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Rejects containment of the slab using a flat cargo-box envelope, despite acknowledging angled long lumber through the passenger area; claims panel width prevents that alternative. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | Uncertain | The no is explicitly for planning with the hatch closed, not a settled physical-fit verdict; diagonal fit remains possible but unverified pending an actual test. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | NO | Gives an explicit No, but its justification is missing verified clearance data rather than demonstrated impossibility; acknowledges diagonal gains without resolving them. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | Uncertain | Rejects un-tilted loading but leaves diagonal fit unresolved and explicitly lacks verified interior dimensions; asks for measurements rather than settling fit. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Gives a clear probable no after considering diagonal and on-edge placements; assumes a closed hatch, usable driver space, and safe dashboard/windshield clearance in Long Mode. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Explicitly denies closed-hatch fit even diagonally, arguing the slab's width conflicts with the footwell, windshield and hatch; permits only protruding or external transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Categorical NO even diagonally, relying on asserted Long Mode length, closed-hatch geometry, driver occupancy and windshield/width constraints. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Categorically rejects every orientation for a fully enclosed load, treating its claimed rear-seat-folded cargo box as the maximum available interior rather than considering further front-seat reconfiguration. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Rejects even diagonal fit with the hatch closed, adding a flat-support requirement and treating Long Mode's claimed narrow length as the maximum diagonal. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Explicitly rejects diagonal fit using claimed 48-inch usable length and 60-inch door-open width; its explanation also conflates carrying the slab with countertop installation. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Explicitly rejects diagonal fit using a claimed 94.3-inch maximum cargo diagonal and also claims front-passenger-seat adjustment cannot provide enough length. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Although it refuses a definitive verdict, it gives an explicit probable no even diagonally, based on typical rear-seat-folded cargo length without verified whole-cabin measurements. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | Uncertain | Explicitly leaves fit unconfirmed: diagonal/on-edge placement may help, but full-panel clearance, loading path and closed-hatch fit require actual measurements. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Categorical no even tilted, treating its claimed 72 × 50 × 42-inch interior box and 97.2-inch diagonal as the maximum, with seats and trim further reducing clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Categorically rejects every orientation, treating the hatch-opening diagonal as a limit on the slab's length and a behind-rear-seat cargo box as decisive, including for loading forward over seats. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | YES | Clearly affirms an on-edge diagonal fit in Long Mode with rear and passenger seats folded, relying on asserted cabin dimensions and a calculated rectangular footprint. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | NO | Categorically rejects diagonal fit and asserts that front seats do not fold, limiting analysis to the rear cargo box; acknowledges estimated dimensions but says the shortfall cannot be overcome. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Resolves its theoretical diagonal possibility into an explicit real-world no, relying on interior obstructions, claimed inability to remove rear seats, and safe or comfortable placement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | YES | Clearly affirms an upward-diagonal fit into the front passenger area despite ruling out a flat fit. Assumes a fully folding passenger seat, a 96-inch load floor and usable vertical clearance toward the dashboard. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | NO | Explicitly says NO even diagonally, using the slab corner diagonal and lack of verified vehicle clearance; this is not a measured proof of impossibility. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | Uncertain | Rejects expecting a verified closed-hatch fit, but leaves a passenger-cabin diagonal explicitly possible and unmeasured. Its bottom-line 'No' concerns what to expect rather than settling physical fit across seat configurations. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Gives an explicit borderline affirmative using the whole cabin, with rear seats folded and the passenger seat reclined toward the footwell. Hatch latching remains measurement-dependent; its diagonal argument does not change the stated qualified yes. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |