Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P1: Inches + centimeters
Add approximate centimeter equivalents to the base question's inch measurements.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches [Removed] thick,[Added] thick (approximately 249 × 65 × 3.8 cm), fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick (approximately 249 × 65 × 3.8 cm), fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | YES | Clearly affirmative with diagonal loading and seat adjustments, but later says the hatch likely will not close and recommends partly open transport. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | NO | Concludes the slab is practically too long even with rear seats folded and the passenger seat moved/reclined flat. Its no concerns reliable, safe enclosed transport, while acknowledging possible diagonal wedging or an opened hatch rather than proving all placements impossible. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Overall recommendation is no for a fully enclosed, closed-hatch fit; it acknowledges a possible marginal diagonal fit and open-hatch transport rather than declaring all physical loading impossible. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | NO | Rejects complete, closed-hatch fit under its Long Mode assumptions; explicitly allows loading with protrusion and a tied-down hatch, not a blanket inability to carry any part inside. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Uncertain | Says fit might be possible but leaves the actual clearance unresolved pending measurement; does not give a probable yes or definite no. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Overall practical rejection assumes doors and hatch shut and a usable, safe car; it acknowledges squeezing the board in with the hatch cracked open, not a fully enclosed transport fit. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | NO | Gives a negative for reliable fit under an added closed-hatch assumption, while allowing that angling might gain enough clearance. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | NO | Firm NO under an added closed-hatch requirement; argues the cargo length is too short and rejects angled or protruding transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | NO | Overall negative verdict: claims the length prevents any realistic interior diagonal fit, not merely unsafe transport. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Predicts near-certain non-fit with an added closed-hatch requirement, arguing that length, width and the load path prevent accommodation. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Overall no is specifically about a closed hatch; separately says transport is possible with protrusion and the hatch tied down. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Rejects fit under added safe-transport and closed-hatch conditions, using boxed dimensions; discusses hatch-open carriage separately. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Clear no even with rear seats folded; assumes fully contained floor loading and rejects diagonal or protruding transport rather than assessing every possible arrangement. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Rejects safe, closed-hatch transport based on its seat-length and support assumptions; acknowledges theoretical diagonal fit and open-hatch loading but does not endorse them as safe fit. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Clearly rejects physical fit on its stated cargo length and width limits, including folded seats; the label records that conclusion without endorsing its dimensional claims. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Clearly denies fit in the standard configuration and says even folded-seat or diagonal arrangements remain too short; no confidence-threshold qualification is given. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Clearly rejects fully enclosed fit, explicitly assuming the rear hatch must close and excluding a protruding hatch-open load from fitting inside. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | NO | Gives a practical negative under added closed-hatch and safe-loading assumptions; acknowledges an angled physical fit is not ruled out. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Explicitly rejects fitting the intact countertop and claims it cannot enter or fit the cabin. Its reasoning adds four passengers and rear seats up, neither specified by the prompt; the final verdict nevertheless claims general physical impossibility rather than only unsafe transport or an inability to close the hatch. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Categorically says it cannot fit regardless of orientation or folded seats, based on claimed cargo-length and diagonal limits; not merely a hatch-closure or safe-driving qualification. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | NO | Explicit no assumes a closed liftgate. Compares 98 inches with a claimed 93-inch Long Mode using folded rear and front passenger seats, and dismisses diagonal placement because of slab width. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | YES | Affirms a whole-cabin diagonal fit with rear/passenger seats folded and the driver's seat fully forward. Requires the hatch actually to close and advises measuring trim-dependent clearance; those caveats do not reverse its clear yes. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Practical no under normal loading and closed-trunk assumptions. It mentions theoretical placement after major modifications but says the car would not be drivable and still rejects practical internal transport. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | NO | Rejects a fully enclosed, hatch-closed fit even with rear and front passenger seats folded, claiming insufficient length and diagonal clearance for the slab's width. Allows transport protruding through an open hatch. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | NO | Rejects a reliable, safe fit with standard seating even after folding/reclining seats, citing insufficient length and diagonal clearance. Acknowledges borderline diagonal wedging, but still concludes no for normal transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | YES | Gives a probable yes for the bare slab with folded rear seats, repositioned passenger seat/headrest, and diagonal loading. Explicitly does not promise hatch closure, may require an open tailgate, and regards boxed or normal cargo loading as unlikely. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | NO | Rejects fit under an added closed-tailgate assumption, arguing length and diagonal clearance are inadequate despite sufficient width and thickness. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | NO | Clearly rejects fit on length grounds with rear seats folded and front seats forward. Also rejects full-cabin diagonal placement because it says the longer theoretical footwell path is obstructed; width, thickness, and hatch opening are not its objections. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | NO | Allows transport, not a fully enclosed fit: recommends a protruding load and open hatch despite folded rear seats and a fully reclined, headrest-free passenger seat. Calls hatch closure a coin flip or bonus, so its affirmative transport claim does not affirm fitting fully inside. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |