Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P3: Seats specified
Specify folded rear seats and a fully reclined passenger seat.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda [Removed] Fit?[Added] Fit with all of the rear seats down and the passenger seat fully reclined?
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit with all of the rear seats down and the passenger seat fully reclined?
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | NO | Overall no is framed as not fitting safely or flat with the specified seats; also claims it cannot fit entirely inside even unboxed. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | YES | Gives a clear probable yes, relying on diagonal loading, passenger-footwell access and sliding the passenger seat forward as well as reclining it. Explicitly withholds a guarantee if only the seatback is reclined with the base in its normal position. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Rejects fully enclosed, closed-hatch fit even with the stated seating arrangement; permits partial loading with an open hatch, so the negative verdict depends on hatch closure. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | NO | Rejects complete fit with the tailgate closed despite the reclined-seat configuration; acknowledges most of it could be loaded with the hatch open. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | NO | Overall prediction is probably not under an added closed-hatch requirement; acknowledges marginal clearance and discusses hatch-open transport separately. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | YES | Acknowledges physical fit diagonally with the passenger headrest removed, while warning of damage and risk and recommending another vehicle. Its negative recommendation does not deny that squeeze-in fit; hatch closure is not established. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | NO | Rejects a flat, level load and advises against relying on a closed-hatch trip; these are added restrictions, and it concedes tilting might permit fit. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | NO | Says no specifically to hatch-closed fit despite the requested folded rear seats and fully reclined passenger seat, adding headrest removal. Cites a claimed 94–97-inch enclosed limit; allows an ajar hatch but discourages driving that way, rather than rejecting width or thickness clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | NO | Clearly rejects physical fit even with the specified seats, claiming insufficient diagonal clearance; also raises dashboard and airbag hazards. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Predicts non-fit with the specified seats and an added closed-hatch requirement; separately allows hatch-open overhang. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Claims length and width prevent hatch closure with the specified seats; allows transport only with the rear hatch tied down over the load. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Says the specified seat arrangement still cannot accommodate it with the hatch closed; distinguishes this from partly protruding hatch-open transport. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Clear rejection of fit in the requested seating configuration. Its reasoning assumes flat front-to-rear loading and inconsistently describes the passenger recline as forward, so this is not an independently verified geometry finding. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Negative verdict assumes safe, flat, fully supported transport with the hatch closed; it acknowledges reports of wedging one in with a tied-down hatch, so it is not an unqualified denial of physical fit. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Explicitly rejects fit with the requested rear seats down and passenger seat reclined, attributing it to length and opening constraints. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Uncertain | Rules out flat placement with the specified reclined passenger seat but leaves diagonal fit unresolved and suggests changing or removing the seat; there is no clear overall verdict covering the possible orientations. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Says neither a straight nor diagonal interior path is long enough despite reclining the passenger seat. Assumes the driver stays in driving position and cites seat/console obstacles, hatch nonclosure and dangerous protrusion. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | NO | Gives a negative practical verdict for the specified seats plus an added closed-hatch requirement; does not claim the nominal length rules out every angle. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Explicitly says it will not fit even with the requested folded rear seats and reclined passenger seat, then claims physical impossibility regardless of seat configuration. The refusal rests on asserted interior dimensions, not an added closed-hatch or safe-driving requirement. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Explicitly rejects fitting even with the requested rear seats folded and passenger seat reclined. Its explanation assumes only the cargo area behind the front seats is usable for a flat load and that reclining adds insufficient length. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | NO | Rejects fit with the hatch closed even in the requested reclined-passenger-seat configuration, using an assumed 93-inch Long Mode limit; allows transport only with an open hatch or outside the cabin. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | NO | Explicitly denies fit with the tailgate closed even using the specified reclined passenger seat; allows only a protruding, tailgate-open workaround, which it excludes from inside fit. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Explicitly says the whole countertop cannot fit even with the specified rear seats down and passenger seat fully reclined, attributing the rejection to insufficient length. | Exact answer & settings 1 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | NO | Rejects fitting fully inside with the hatch closed, asserting a 96-inch maximum diagonal even with the specified seats. Allows transport with an open hatch, so its no is not a blanket rejection of carrying the board. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Empty answer | The request did not produce a non-empty final answer. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | NO | Explicitly rejects fully enclosed fit with the hatch closed, based on assumed straight flat cargo length even with the passenger seat reclined; its probable yes applies only to an open-hatch overhang. | Exact answer & settings 3 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | YES | Affirms a barely fitting bare countertop with angling, passenger-seat adjustment and footwell use. Packaging may prevent fit; the hatch must close without force and the load must be secured. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | YES | Affirms a tight diagonal fit through the reclined passenger-seat zone into the footwell. Assumes the board can clear seat hardware and the console along its estimated path; hatch closure and driver clearance are not established. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Overall yes depends on a near-limit diagonal from passenger footwell to rear hatch corner and an adjusted, flattened passenger seat. Hatch latching remains conditional: it permits a strapped hatch or an alternative if closure fails, not guaranteed fully enclosed transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |