Fit agreement · eligible for rank
P7: Dimensions reordered
Keep the same inch measurements but present depth, thickness, then length.
Changes from the base question.
Changes from P2: Removed words Added words. Unmarked wording is unchanged. The exact sent prompt is preserved separately below.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures [Removed] 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches [Removed] thick,[Added] thick × 98 inches long, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
Read the P2 base question
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 98 inches long × 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
The exact prompt sent.
Can the IKEA KARLBY countertop in the 98-inch size, which measures 25 5/8 inches deep × 1 1/2 inches thick × 98 inches long, fit inside a third-generation (2016) Honda Fit?
No owner-reported answer key is included. Download the exact experiment definition.
One question, every model.
Selected outcomes only; every row links to exact output, request settings, and full attempt history. Focus this region and use arrow keys, or swipe, to scroll on small screens.
| Model | Reviewed label / status | Review reason / coverage note | Exact text & provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | NO | Gives an almost-certain no, claiming insufficient closed-tailgate length and diagonal clearance even with rear seats folded and the front passenger seat repositioned; the unboxing suggestion does not reverse that verdict. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| StepFun: Step 5 Preview | YES | Clear yes assumes diagonal footwell-to-rear loading with the front passenger seat forward and fully reclined. Instructions combine folded-flat rear seatbacks with raised rear cushions called Long Mode; hatch clearance is predicted rather than established, with padding/restraint and delivery cautions. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | NO | Says no for a stock car with a closed hatch and safe full enclosure, citing a 93-inch Long Mode limit and slab width; leaves open hatch-open transport or passenger-seat removal. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Wonder | NO | Distinguishes hatch-ajar transport from fitting fully inside: rejects the latter despite folding/moving the passenger seat, citing a 92–93-inch usable length and width-related obstructions. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | NO | Overall probable no for closed-tailgate transport, based on recalled Long Mode length even with the passenger seat reclined. Calls the fit borderline and asks for measurement, while treating tailgate-open carriage as an unrecommended fallback. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B | NO | Rejects full enclosure even with the passenger seat forward and diagonal placement, claiming insufficient interior length; allows insertion only with an end protruding through the hatch or window. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna | Uncertain | Warns against reliable hatch-closed transport but explicitly leaves a tilted fit possible after test-fitting, without settling physical fit. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | YES | Explicitly affirms a borderline fit using careful angling, folded rear seats and a forward/reclined front passenger seat; does not promise full enclosure and says the hatch may not latch. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | NO | Says probably not fully inside, asserting insufficient length even with rear seats folded, the passenger seat moved forward, and diagonal positioning. Its partly-outside transport option does not reverse that interior-fit verdict. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 | NO | Says probably not with the hatch closed, treating folded-rear/reclined-passenger Long Mode as the longest diagonal and five inches too short. Acknowledges open-hatch carriage separately but rejects it on safety grounds. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | NO | Rejects fit with the hatch closed, using a claimed 93-inch Long Mode limit and width restrictions on diagonal loading; explicitly allows transport with the passenger seat reclined and hatch tied open. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Google: Gemini 4 Argon | NO | Explicit no assumes the hatch must close, including with passenger-side Long Mode. Claims length, packaged width, driver-space interference, and windshield risk rule out the needed angle; open-hatch transport is offered only as an alternative. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| IBM: Granite 4.2 8B | NO | Explicit negative rests mainly on flat cargo-floor placement with rear seats folded and a claimed 60–63-inch usable length. It does not evaluate a rearranged front passenger seat, dismisses creative angles, and partly substitutes practical/safe floor loading for unrestricted cabin placement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Meta: Muse Spark Open | NO | Rejects closed-hatch fit, assuming the front passenger seat cannot create a flat cargo extension and the wide slab cannot use the narrow-object diagonal; allows protruding hatch-open loading with safety caveats. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 | NO | Categorically rejects fit, even with rear-seat removal, using a claimed 47.5-inch folded-seat cargo length; does not develop a front-passenger-seat or diagonal configuration. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | NO | Says the slab cannot fit even diagonally, using rear-folded cargo dimensions and roofline/hatch constraints as effective cabin limits; recommends shortening it or external transport rather than another seat arrangement. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | NO | Gives a clear very-unlikely/no verdict, claiming inadequate length even with rear seats folded and the passenger seat forward, and width-related dashboard/roof obstructions to diagonal loading. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | Uncertain | Warns against assuming hatch-closed fit but does not establish impossibility: advertised Long Mode is shorter, while diagonal clearance remains unresolved. Requires measurement or a template to confirm clearance, hatch closure, and driver/airbag safety. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Upstage: Solar Mini 4 | NO | Categorical NO based on an asserted 80-inch cabin length; proposes cutting the countertop or a larger vehicle rather than intact interior fit. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Cohere: Command A+ | NO | Explicit NO for all interior positions; treats wheelbase as a cabin-length limit and relies on asserted cargo dimensions. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | YES | Clearly predicts a barely enclosed fit unboxed, with rear seats folded and the front passenger seat reclined/folded; packaging may defeat the assumed clearance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | NO | Explicit no is for a closed hatch, including front-passenger-folded Long Mode. Uses a claimed 96-inch limit and a flat rectangular rotation argument to reject diagonal fit; treats open-hatch carriage as outside the question. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B | NO | Categorically rejects placement anywhere inside, treating the claimed 68–70-inch rear-folded cargo length and 83-inch diagonal as whole-cabin limits; no alternative front-seat configuration qualifies its verdict. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Mistral: Mistral Large 4 | NO | Rejects hatch-closed fit with seats installed; mentions passenger-seat removal as a possible modification but still predicts hatch obstruction and unsafe, impractical transport. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Empty answer | The request did not produce a non-empty final answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | API error | The provider or API returned an error; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime | Uncertain | Offers only possible fit with rear seats flat, a fold-forward front passenger seat, and angled loading. Its borderline/no is conditional on ordinary rear-seat folding or guaranteed easy hatch closure, not a settled physical-fit verdict; packaging and actual clearance remain unresolved. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Transport error | The request failed in transit; there is no scored answer. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |
| Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Prime | YES | Clear yes requires diagonal placement over folded rear/passenger seats toward the dashboard and moving the driver forward. Claims most hatches latch but admits some remain ajar and suggests strapping them shut; dashboard/windshield contact and restraint warnings do not negate its affirmative fit stance. | Exact answer & settings 2 attempt records |